
Homeland
Security tech spending on the way up
By Greta Wodele, National Journal's Technology Daily
October 26, 2004
President Bush and
Congress have provided the Homeland Security Department millions
of dollars next year for a myriad of technology-related programs
to bolster security. But while Bush last week signed into
law a bill approving $32 billion in spending, lawmakers also
criticized some of the department's efforts to employ new
technologies.
The measure is
the second funding bill for the fledgling department. Since
the department's creation in early 2003, lawmakers have allocated
federal dollars to research and develop new devices for security,
update information technology systems to share information
among law enforcers, and prepare "first responders" to
emergencies for another potential terrorist attack. Congress
also has funded advanced technology, such as scanned fingerprints
to imbed in travel documents, to increase security at air,
land and seaports.
"This bill
reflects the president's commitment to defend America by
making sure the federal government and state and local first
responders have the resources they need to prevent terrorist
attacks within the United States," the White House said
statement after Bush signed the bill.
Protection By Air,
Land And Sea
Among other technology-related
funds, the statute includes: $8.5 billion for border security
and immigration enforcement; $5.1 billion for aviation security;
$4 billion for grants to state and local emergency workers;
$150 million for port security grants; $150 million for rail
and transportation security grants; and $340 million to complete
a biometric system to track foreign visitors entering and
exiting the country.
For the entry-exit
system, which is known as US-VISIT, House and Senate appropriators
said they are "troubled by the security gap on the nation's
borders" caused by delays in linking the US-VISIT database
with criminal databases operated by the FBI. The two systems
currently are incompatible because US-VISIT uses a two-fingerprint
scan, while the FBI's database requires all 10 fingerprints
for background searches on people.
" With implementation
of a new visa-tracking system and enrollment of millions
of visitors into US-VISIT, it is essential that [homeland
security officials] collaborate with the FBI to ensure that
[the US-VISIT system] can retrieve, in real time, biometric
information contained in the [FBI] database," the law
says.
The act also includes
$2 billion to screen passengers and bags at airports. Of
that amount, officials must spend $180 million to buy explosive-detection
systems and $45 million to install them. To research and
develop new transportation security devices, Congress included
$178 million, and $54 million must be used to develop advanced
explosive-detection devices.
For seaports, the
Coast Guard would receive $982 million to upgrade its equipment,
vessels and facilities. Lawmakers said the agency must use
$724 million for its beleaguered Deepwater program. Officials
recently told Congress the 20-year, multibillion-dollar initiative
is falling behind schedule and would cost $2.2 billion more
than estimated.
The program aims
to integrate the Coast Guard's ships, aircraft, unmanned
aerial vehicles, and computer and surveillance logistics,
among other things. The Government Accountability Office
said Congress would need to fund Deepwater at $795 million
annually adjusted for inflation to finish it by 2022.
GAO also found
that the Coast Guard's second-largest procurement program,
Rescue21, has encountered delays due to software integration
problems. The program would replace the agency's antiquated
communications system at an estimated cost of $953 million.
Lawmakers did not approve any funding for the program.
Coast Guard officials
told Congress this year that they are unsure whether they
will complete the program at the end of 2006 but that they
do not anticipate additional costs. The system would let
officials digitally call on distressed boaters, among other
activities.
Lawmakers did allocate
$18.5 million to research and develop advanced technology
for seaport security. To pre-screen cargo at foreign seaports,
lawmakers included $126 million for the Container Security
Initiative (CSI). And for border security, lawmakers appropriated
$64.2 million for monitoring devices.
Internal And External
Technology
To combat cyber
threats, the bill includes $67 million -- a $2.1 million
increase over last year -- to expand activities at Homeland
Security's cyber-security division. Some lawmakers have criticized
the department for not spending enough resources on the issue.
The division is charged with identifying, analyzing and issuing
threat warnings to the public.
Congress allocated
$10 million to integrate a dozen federal lists of suspected
terrorists' names. The department has come under fire for
not moving quickly to overcome technological and policy hurdles
to consolidate lists. Law enforcement officials currently
cannot access information on all the lists immediately.
The lawmakers appropriated
$449 million for the customs and border security directorate
to complete the upgrade of its accounting system. The department
said this summer it was testing a monthly accounting program
that consolidates trade transactions, account statements
and payment capabilities in an effort to increase efficiency
and protect against terrorism.
The program will
help the directorate collect and analyze transaction data,
which will be shared among more than 20 government agencies
that regulate U.S. borders and the trade community. The program
will be implemented by 2007. Within the directorate, the
customs and immigration enforcement wing would receive $40
million to upgrade its accounting system.
Congress also provided
$275 million for Homeland Security's chief information officer
-- a significant increase over Bush's $226 million request.
The CIO must use $208 million to invest in department-wide
technology programs.
Of that funding,
$91 million is for information technology services; $86 million
is for department wireless devices; $13 million is for the
department's computer architecture and portal technology;
and $8 million is for satellite imagery. The appropriators
required the CIO to spend $49 million on E-Merge, a program
designed to guide department-wide investments and to integrate
financial and human resources systems.
The lawmakers appropriated
$1 billion for the science and technology division, which
coordinates research and development of technologies and
acquires existing technologies. The division must spend $593
million to develop technologies that counter threats from
chemical, biological, nuclear and radiological weapons, and
high explosives, and $61 million to develop counter measures
to protect commercial aircraft against shoulder-fired missiles.
Channels Of Communication
The science and
technology division also will receive $11 million for SAFECOM,
a wireless initiative created to ensure that firefighters
and other first responders have equipment that can "talk" across
jurisdictions during emergencies.
The spending bill
further includes $15 million for the National
Incident Management System to coordinate first responders
and federal officials. First responders recently expressed
concerns about federal funding for NIMS, an unrealistic deadline,
poor access to training, the lack of a well-defined model
for an interdisciplinary emergency system, and the ability
of responders' equipment to communicate across jurisdictions.
Homeland Security
Secretary Tom Ridge last month outlined minimum requirements
each state must meet by 2006. After 2007, states would only
receive federal grant funding if they have met the implementation
requirements.
Finally, to better
exchange information about flood hazards, the department
is spending $200 million to update the flood-mapping system.
Michael Brown, Homeland Security's undersecretary for emergency
preparedness and response, told Congress this year that "more
than two-thirds of the maps are more than 10 years old."
The information,
which is used by communities, lenders, insurance agents and
others, also is incompatible with geographic information
system technology, he said. The modernization program would
enable the exchange of flood-hazard data through the Internet.
[Top of Page]

FEMA
Homeland Security Announces Improved Resource Management
Tools For National Incident Management
System
Release Date: October
20, 2004
Release Number: HQ-04-500
WASHINGTON, D.C.
-- The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in coordination with
the National Incident Management System (NIMS)
Integration Center, has updated enhanced resource management
tools designed to help incident managers identify, obtain
and track needed resources during an incident or disaster.
“The skillful
management of resources during an emergency is critical to
an effective response operation,” said Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Emergency Preparedness
and Response. “Managers must be able to communicate
clearly with each other regarding the exact type of equipment,
teams or personnel being requested during emergency situations.
These improved tools also will help federal, state and local
officials ensure that equipment and teams deployed through
the system are compatible with those of neighboring jurisdictions
that work together through mutual aid agreements.”
The new products
include an updated National Mutual Aid Glossary of Terms
and Definitions, which provides terms for equipment, teams
and personnel used in disasters. Resource Typing Definitions – II
categorizes equipment and teams by functional grouping and
then 'types' or organizes them according to capability and/or
capacity.
Resource management
is a key component of NIMS,
the first-ever national, standardized approach to incident
management and response, which was developed by Homeland
Security Secretary Tom Ridge at the request of President
Bush. NIMS is managed and maintained
by Homeland Security’s NIMS Integration
Center. Federal, state and local officials should use the
120 typed definitions as they develop or update their inventories
of response assets.
Resource typing
establishes common resource definitions, developed by experts
in the emergency management community, that help make ordering
and dispatching resources during an incident more efficient
and ensure that responders receive the resources they need
during an emergency or disaster.
An initial 60 typed
definitions were released in March 2004 as part of the National
Mutual Aid and Resource Management Initiative. The new Resource
Typing Definitions – II provides definitions for and
types an additional 60 resources for a total of 120; the
glossary has been updated to include the additional 60 resources.
The glossary and resource typing definitions may be downloaded
at www.fema.gov/nims/.
The resource definitions
were developed by federal, state, and local experts from
the following disciplines: Animal Health, Emergency Management,
Emergency Medical Fire/Hazardous Materials, Emergency Medical
Services, Health and Medical, Law Enforcement, Public Works,
and Search and Rescue.
On March 1, 2003,
FEMA became part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
FEMA's continuing mission within the new department is to
lead the effort to prepare the nation for all hazards and
effectively manage federal response and recovery efforts
following any national incident. FEMA also initiates proactive
mitigation activities, trains first responders, and manages
the National Flood Insurance Program and the U.S. Fire Administration.
[Top of Page]

Kinston
adopts emergency plan
October 19,2004
BOB SHILES
Staff Writer
Kinston has joined
communities across the country in adopting a unified plan
to deal with domestic emergencies, including major acts of
terrorism.
City Council voted
unanimously Monday to adopt the National
Incident Management System, a plan used nationwide
at all levels of government and private organizations that
helps entities work together to prepare for, respond to and
recover from emergencies.
Adoption of the
system, developed by the Department of Homeland Security
in response to a 2003 presidential directive, is mandatory
for a government or non-government entity to receive any
form of federal preparedness assistance.
"The government
is saying we have to standardize," said Greg Smith,
the city's public safety director. "If we don't adopt
the system, we can get no federal aid."
Smith noted that
there will have to be some modifications to existing incident
emergency management plans used by the city's police and
fire departments, but they are minimal and mostly deal with
terminology. The last 18 years, the fire department has used
an incident command system similar to the plan developed
by the Department of Homeland Security.
At a recent meeting
in Baltimore with Homeland Security officials, Smith said
there was some opposition to the mandate that the National
Incident Management System be used in all emergency
prevention, preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation
programs in order for federal preparedness assistance to
be received.
"But Homeland
Security officials said we're going to learn to play ball
together," the director said. "After that, no one
had anything to say."
While noting that
the police department will have to make the most adjustments
- especially in terminology- to conform with the national
system, City Manager Ralph Clark said adopting the plan is
in the best interest of the city.
"It's absolutely
a good system," he said. "Everything will be much
more uniform."
Bob Shiles can be reached at (252) 527-3191, Ext. 237, or at Bob_Shiles@link.freedom.com.
[Top of Page]

Regional
approaches get thumbs-up
Homeland security officials tackle preparedness planning
BY Diane Frank
Oct. 18, 2004
Homeland Security
Department officials must overcome barriers at every level
to successfully safeguard the nation with a regional approach.
That's the view of policy officials who are leading efforts
to organize public safety responses to potential terrorist
attacks.
A regional approach
to homeland security has been a major part of DHS officials'
strategy since the department's creation. Regional organizations
can offer better prevention and responses through targeted
coordination. Concerns in one part of the country can differ
from concerns in another part of the country, said Dan Kaniewski,
deputy director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute
at the George Washington University.
The Washington,
D.C., region, "one that has a federal presence, one
that has three very different political jurisdictions ...is
not the same as in Texas," Kaniewski said. Texas has "border
issues that we don't have to contend with," he said,
speaking at an Oct. 5 event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation.
Some state officials
have Canadian border concerns, while others have seaport
issues, all of which create a compelling need to look at
homeland security from a regional perspective, he said.
Circumstances differ
in every section of the country, and even within a single
region, the risks and threats change enough to require shifts
in policies and resources, said John Cohen, Massachusetts'
homeland security policy adviser.
Massachusetts officials
have set up preparedness regions within the state and also
have formed regional partnerships with other states, including
New York, Maine and Delaware. "It's not just because
we're neighbors with each other but [because] we share many
of the same problems that we have to face," Cohen said.
Developing regional
responses might finally get under way now that a fiscal 2005
appropriations bill for DHS has passed both houses of Congress.
The bill contains more than $200 million for administrative
and regional operations in the Emergency Preparedness and
Response Directorate. The conference report also encourages
DHS officials to create regional offices to support the National
Incident Management System and includes other language
focusing on regional efforts.
The conference report,
however, also requires DHS officials to notify lawmakers
10 days before taking any action to consolidate existing
regional offices. That congressional involvement and potential
for interference could create barriers to DHS Secretary Tom
Ridge's efforts to create a regionally focused organization
for homeland security preparedness, said Dick Armey, former
House majority leader.
One of the first
regional organizations is the National Capital Region, which
includes Washington, D.C., and parts of Maryland and Virginia.
Home to the federal government, the region has many special
features that other parts of the country lack.
However, officials
in other regions can follow the model of the National Capital
Region's governance structure and the experience of its officials
in building that structure, said George Foresman, Virginia's
deputy assistant to the governor for commonwealth preparedness.
Foresman said governance
is at the heart of any regional effort. Until all players
share a common governance structure, use the same language
and adopt the same priorities, nothing can be accomplished,
he said. The governance challenge is further complicated
by legal issues, including differences in states' liability
statutes.
Knowing that the
results of shared governance contribute to the common good
isn't always enough to push people to the goal, he added. "It's
easy to say you want to do regionalism; it's phenomenally
difficult to go from concept to completion," he said.
Starting from scratch
in preparing for regional threats can have both positive
and negative consequences, homeland security experts said.
"The great
challenge that we face in looking at regional collaboration
and regional cooperative efforts is to respect the regional
boundaries that exist across multiple functions of government,
across multiple activities in the private sector, and build
those into a collaborative environment where we can take
a target and risk assessment and apply it in a reasonable
and an equitable manner," Foresman said.
Cohen agreed to
an extent. "We tried to, as much as possible, take into
account current, existing regional structures" in Massachusetts,
he said. "But at the end of the day, direct vulnerability
and risk were what drove how we structured the state planning,
how we distributed our funds and how we tasked the regional
planning entities to work together in developing their strategies
for their region."
[Top of Page]

Fact
Sheet: Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act
of 2005
Monday, Oct 18, 2004
Today President George W. Bush signed the FY 2005 Homeland Security Appropriations
Act, which provides $28.9 billion in net discretionary spending for the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This is $1.8 billion more than
the FY 2004 enacted level – reflecting a 6.6% increase in funding
for the Department over the previous year. Including Project BioShield,
mandatory and fee-funded programs, a total of $40.7 billion will be available
to the Department in FY 2005.
The funding provided
in FY 2005 reflects the ongoing commitment by the Administration
and the Congress to secure the homeland. The act will allow
the Department to build upon significant investments to date
by improving our safeguards against terrorism, while sustaining
the many other important departmental activities.
Strengthening Border and Port Security
The Act includes
$419.2 million in new funding to enhance border and port
security activities, including the expansion of pre-screening
cargo containers in high-risk areas and the detection of
individuals attempting to illegally enter the United States.
Additional funding
for the U.S. Coast Guard (+$500 million, an 8.6-percent increase)
will upgrade port security efforts and provide additional
resources to implement the Maritime Transportation Security
Act. Key enhancements funded by the act include:
The Container Security
Initiative (CSI) focuses on pre-screening cargo before it
reaches our shores. The act includes an increase of $25 million
over the current program funding of $101 million to continue
both Phases I and II, as well as to begin the final phase
of CSI.
The United States
Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US –VISIT)
program's first phase was deployed at 115 airports and 14
seaports. US VISIT expedites the arrival and departure of
legitimate travelers, while making it more difficult for
those intending to do us harm to enter our nation. The act
provides $340 million in 2005, an increase of $12 million
over the FY 2004 funding, to continue expansion of the US
VISIT system.
Aerial Surveillance
and Sensor Technology increases the effectiveness of the
more than 12,000 Border Patrol agents deployed along the
borders, and supports other missions such as drug interdiction.
The act includes $64.2 million for CBP to enhance land-based
detection and monitoring of movement between the ports. The
act also includes $28 million for CBP to increase the flight
hours of P-3 aircraft and $12.5 million for long range radar
operations.
Radiation Detection
Monitors screen passengers and cargo coming into the United
States. The act includes $80 million for the next generation
of screening devices for our nation's ports of entry.
CBP Targeting Systems
aid in identifying high-risk cargo and passengers. The act
includes an increase of $20.6 million for staffing and technology
acquisition to support the National Targeting Center, trend
analysis, and the Automated Targeting Systems.
The Customs Trade
Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) focuses on partnerships
to improve security along the entire supply chain, from the
factory floor, to foreign vendors, land borders and seaports.
The FY 2005 appropriation includes an increase of $15.2 million
for this effort.
The act increases
the U.S. Coast Guard's budget by 9 percent -- from $5.8 billion
in FY 2004 to $6.3 billion in FY 2005. In addition to maintaining
its ongoing mission, the budget provides over $100 million
to support the implementation of the Maritime Transportation
Security Act, which will increase the Coast Guard's ability
to develop, review and approve vessel and port security plans,
improve underwater detection capabilities, and increase the
intelligence program. The budget also provides for the Coast
Guard's ongoing Integrated Deepwater System initiative, funding
the program at $724 million, an increase of $56 million over
the FY 2004 funding level.
Enhancing
Biodefense
An additional $2.5
billion for Project BioShield will be available starting
in FY 2005 for the development and pre-purchase of necessary
medical countermeasures against weapons of mass destruction,
and improved bio-surveillance by expanding air monitoring
for biological agents in high-threat cities and high-value
targets such as stadiums and transit systems. Specifically,
the FY 2005 appropriation funds the following initiatives:
Project BioShield
allows the Federal Government to pre-purchase critically
needed vaccines and medications for biodefense as soon as
experts agree that they are safe and effective enough to
be added to the Strategic National Stockpile. The program
seeks to encourage the development of necessary medical countermeasures
against a biological, radiological, or nuclear attack. Starting
in 2005, $2.5 billion will be available for BioShield.
Improving Biosurveillance,
within DHS, will involve the Science and Technology (S&T)
and Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP)
directorates.
In S&T, the
act provides a total of $118 million to enhance current environmental
monitoring activities. A key component of this initiative
will be an expansion and deployment of the next generation
of technologies related to the BioWatch Program, a bio-surveillance
warning system.
In IAIP, $11 million
is appropriated to integrate, in real-time, bio-surveillance
data collected from sensors throughout the country and fuse
this data with information from health and agricultural surveillance
and other terrorist-threat information from the law enforcement
and intelligence communities.
National Disaster
Medical System (NDMS) is responsible for managing and coordinating
the Federal medical response to major emergencies and federally
declared disasters. For 2005, the act includes $20 million
in FEMA for planning and exercises associated with medical
surge capabilities.
Information
Analysis and Infrastructure Protection
The act provides
$894 million, a 7 percent increase from FY 2004 to Information
Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP), which will
enhance capabilities to receive intelligence and information
from an expanded set of sources, to assess the vulnerabilities
of the nation's assets and critical infrastructure, to assess
consequences, and to add capabilities in remediation and
protective actions. Key provisions include:
Threat Determination
and Assessment provides tools and unique analytical capability
to enhance the Government's ability to integrate, synchronize
and correlate sources of information relating to homeland
security, emanating from both traditional (Intelligence and
federal law enforcement communities) and non-traditional
(state and local governments and private industry) sources,
and integrate that knowledge with an understanding of exploitable
infrastructure vulnerabilities.
$67.4 million, a
$2.1 million increase over FY 2004, to expand the capabilities
of the National Cyber Security Division (NCSD), which implements
the public and private sector partnership protecting cyber
security as it identifies, analyzes, and reduces threats
and vulnerabilities; disseminates threat warning information;
and coordinates cyber incident preparedness, response, and
recovery efforts.
Improving
Aviation Security
$5.1 billion for
the Transportation Security Administration, including aviation
security fees, a $679 million increase over 2004. These funds
will be used to continue to improve the quality and efficiency
of screening operations through additional screener training,
stronger management controls of screener performance, and
technology automation.
The act includes
$475 million to continue deploying more efficient baggage
screening solutions at our nation's busiest airports. This
funding will be used to improve the integration of explosive
detection system (EDS) equipment into individual airports'
baggage processing. This will increase security effectiveness
and promote greater efficiency.
The act includes
$115 million for air cargo security, to continue the research
and deployment of screening technology started in FY 2004
and to increase air cargo inspectors.
In addition, the
Federal Air Marshals (FAMS) program, which has been moved
to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), receives $663
million in the act, an increase of $50 million over the FY
2004 level.
$61 million is appropriated
to the DHS Science and Technology directorate, to accelerate
development of more effective technologies to counter the
threat of portable anti-aircraft missiles.
Support
for State and Local Governments and First Responders
The act provides
a total of $4 billion for state and local assistance programs.
State-based formula
grants are funded at $1.5 billion, including $400 million
for law enforcement, with provisions directing the use of
the per capita formula. The “all hazards” Emergency
Management Performance Grant program is funded at $180 million.
Urban Area Security
Initiative (UASI) grants are provided $885 million, below
the request of $1.45 billion. The bill provides a total of
$315 million in transportation security grants – in
particular, $150 million each for port security grants and
rail/transit security grants.
Firefighter assistance
grants are funded at $715 million, including $65 million
for hiring, compared with the request of $500 million. The
statement of managers calls for retaining the program's “all
hazards” focus.
The act recognizes
the Department's implementation of HSPD-8, and sets deadlines
for establishing first responder preparedness levels in January
2005, and releasing the National Preparedness Goal in March
2005.
Enhancing
Immigration Security and Enforcement
The Act provides
an increase of $179 million for improvements in immigration
enforcement both domestically and overseas, including $123
million for the detention and removal of illegal aliens.
To enhance immigration security and enforcement, the act
includes:
Detention and Removal.
An increase of $123 million in FY 2005 will expand ongoing
fugitive apprehension efforts and the removal from the United
States of jailed offenders, support additional detention
and removal capacity.
Immigration Enforcement
appropriated funding increases by $56 million for detecting
and locating individuals in the United States who are in
violation of immigration laws, or who are engaging in immigration-related
fraud and will improve visa security by working cooperatively
with U.S. consular offices to review visa applications.
Eliminating
the Immigration Backlog
The act includes
$160 million in total resources to continue progress toward
a six-month processing for all immigration applications,
while maintaining security and continuing the President's
multi-year $500 million initiative to reduce the backlog
of applications. CIS has continued the focus on quality improvements
and expanded national security checks, such as performing
background name checks on all applications before approval.
Increasing
DHS Preparedness and Response Capacity
The bill includes
$3.1 billion for the Emergency Preparedness and Response
Directorate. This funding supports the Nation's ability to
prepare for, mitigate against, respond to and recover from
natural and man made disasters. This includes $2 billion
for the Disaster Relief Fund to allow DHS to provide support
to states for response and recovery to unforeseen emergencies
and natural disasters.
Strengthening
the National Incident Management
System (NIMS)
The act provides
$15 million for the National Incident
Management System (NIMS).
The NIMS provides a national
framework for Federal, State, Territorial, Tribal, and local
jurisdictions to work together more effectively to prevent,
prepare for, respond to, and recover from all domestic incidents.
The NIMS funding will be used
to develop NIMS related training,
guidance and other publications to support NIMS implementation.
The funding will also be used to support effective resource
management through the development of a national resource
management system, an inventory of federal response assets,
and the development of a national credentialing system.
[Top of Page]

Emergency
preparedness deadlines loom
Officials push for progress on managing national incidents
BY Diane Frank
Oct. 11, 2004
In a letter to
governors last month, Homeland Security Department Secretary
Tom Ridge urged government leaders to prepare for participation
in the National Incident Management
System (NIMS). Federal,
state and local officials are required to be part of NIMS by
the end of 2007.
According to the
timeline in Ridge's letter, state and local officials should
evaluate which parts of NIMS need
improvement in fiscal 2006. If they have not met the fiscal
2007 deadline, DHS officials can deny federal emergency preparedness
funding for those agencies, said Gil Jamieson, acting director
of the NIMS Integration Center.
He testified Sept.
29 before the House Select Committee on Homeland Security's
Emergency Preparedness and Response Subcommittee.
Officials at all
levels of government have cited NIMS as
a critical factor in their ability to respond during tests
of homeland security preparedness. At a hearing last month,
Michael Freeman, chairman of the International Association
of Fire Chiefs' Terrorism and Homeland Security Committee,
described NIMS as "an efficient
and effective way to bring resources together to respond
to large-scale incidents."
At the core of NIMS is
the Incident Command System, which was developed in the 1990s
to manage multiple jurisdictions battling wildfires. "ICS
clearly works on a large scale," Freeman said, adding
that it also is useful for managing small, daily incidents.
NIMS benefits
health care workers by covering critical gaps in incident
management, said Dr. Joseph Barbera, co-director of the Institute
for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management at George Washington
University.
Community health
employees discovered the system's benefits during exercises
nationwide, including DHS' TopOff 2 drill in the Chicago
area last year, said Barbera, who served as an observer for
the Department of Health and Human Services.
DHS officials developed NIMS as
a framework for baseline capabilities across all levels of
government. The system ensures that when an attack or natural
disaster occurs, public safety officials can quickly establish
a coordinated response.
"It's a balance
between flexibility and standardization," said Michelle
McQueeney, a program specialist at the NIMS Integration
Center's Standards and Resources Branch. She spoke at the
recent annual conference of the National Association of State
Chief Information Officers in Chicago.
NIMS helps
with standards, training and other issues that fall within
several broad categories, such as command and management.
In each of those
areas, officials at the NIMS Integration
Center will assist with and expand programs in other parts
of DHS, such as the Safecom program and other agency initiatives,
McQueeney said. Safecom officials are developing standards
for making communications systems interoperable.
Technology plays
a role in all of those areas, but funding is also a consideration,
said Jim Dillon, CIO for the state of New York. States are
beginning to pull out of the economic difficulties that have
caused massive spending cuts in the past few years, and officials
at local governments are struggling to prioritize spending
on everything from emergency response to education, he said.
McQueeney said officials
at the integration center, created in June, are helping agency
officials with many tasks, such as justifying emergency preparedness
funding to budget officials. They also are trying to offset
some costs through centralized resources such as online training.
Center officials
will work, when necessary, on integrating systems. Building
a national credential database from state databases will
be required for NIMS.
***
Ridge issues schedule
Homeland Security
Department Secretary Tom Ridge set deadlines for federal,
state and local government officials to participate in the National
Incident Management System (NIMS),
a system for coordinating responses to terrorist attacks
or other crises. Fiscal 2005 will be a start-up year, and
in fiscal 2006, improvements will be made. After fiscal 2007,
officials of state and local governments will not receive
federal emergency preparedness grants until they can fully
participate in NIMS.
In fiscal 2005,
state and local government officials must, at a minimum,
begin:
Incorporating NIMS into
training programs and exercises.
Ensuring that federal preparedness grants support NIMS at
state and local levels.
Incorporating NIMS into emergency operations
plans.
Promoting intrastate mutual aid agreements.
Coordinating and providing technical assistance to local entities for NIMS.
Institutionalizing the use of the Incident Command System.
Source: NIMS Integration Center
[Top of Page]

New
incident system for telecommunicators
By Karl Chalabala
Tue, Oct 12, 2004
Delaware
A new system to
handle emergencies from a nuclear holocaust to a car crash
is going into place across the country. The National
Incident Management System (NIMS)
will give emergency personnel, state agencies and the military
standardized protocols to follow when emergencies occur.
NIMS became
effective March 1, and by Oct. 1, 2005, it will be the mandated
standard across the country.
The Association
of Public-Safety Communication Officials (APCO) held a training
conference for telecommunicators in Dewey Beach over the
weekend. Emergency personnel, first-responders and dispatchers
from Delmarva heard NIMS explained
for the first time during the conference.
“ We learned
a lot from 9-11 where a bunch of agencies were working on
one thing together,” said Delaware State Police Lt.
Ron Hagan. “The fire service has been using NIMS for
30 years after the large wildfires out west. When the federal
government said they wanted a standard system, the fire service
said they already had one.”
NIMS revolves
around six principles. The first is that every group that
might respond to an emergency must have NIMS-trained
staff.
The second principle
is preparedness.
“ If you know
a hurricane is coming, you know what you are going to need
during the incident,” Hagan said. “You can get
the ball rolling.”
NIMS preparedness
mandates mutual aid agreements to share equipment and personnel,
public outreach efforts to prevent death or injuries, structural
retrofitting and insurance to save property.
The next NIMS principle
is resource management. NIMS mandates
a protocol to describe and inventory resources, as well as
methods for deploying, using and retrieving those resources
before and after emergencies.
The third principle,
which most affects public safety communications officials,
is communications and information management.
“ It’s
nice to know when I’m working on the radio with the
fire service that I can get through to DelDOT (Department
of Transportation) without jumping through a lot of hoops,” Hagan
said of the benefits of NIMS. “Interoperability
is the key word here.”
NIMS communications
and information management aims to develop and maintain overall
awareness and understanding of an incident within and across
jurisdictions, according to their manual.
The next NIMS principle
concerns supporting technologies. NIMS mandates
research and development efforts be made to ensure emergency
responders receive the best technology available.
The last NIMS principle
is the on-going management and maintenance protocol, which
concerns the overall management of the NIMS system.
Anyone
interested in NIMS can find
the complete explanation on the web site, www.fema.gov.
[Top of Page]

FEMA
Releases New Study Course for Disaster Response Personnel
Available at the National Emergency Training Center virtual campus
By News Story - October 2004
Michael D. Brown,
under secretary of the Department of Homeland Security for
Emergency Preparedness and Response, announced recently the
release of the new IS-200 Basic Incident Command System course
for federal disaster workers and all emergency personnel
with disaster response duties.
"We continue
to design and deliver educational materials to support basic
Incident Command System knowledge and the National
Incident Management System," said Brown. "President
Bush and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge continue to
move the nation rapidly toward the implementation of a National
Incident Management System, and FEMA continues to
rapidly develop the support materials for this national initiative."
This course is
designed to identify ICS features and principles, describing
in more detail elements such as: Establishment & Transfer
of Command, Management by Objectives, Unified Command, ICS
Management Functions, Organizational Flexibility, Unity and
Chain of Command, Span of Control, Incident Action Plans,
Resource Management, Common Terminology and Clear Text, Integrated
Communications, and Personnel Accountability. A disaster
scenario threads throughout the course to describe the common
responsibilities associated with incident assignments from
a federal disaster response workforce perspective.
This course has
been developed to compliment the I-100 course for federal
disaster workers, and to take the student's education to
the ICS 200 level. The specific target audience is the FEMA
disaster response workforce and others involved in disaster
response to the Incident Command System. IS-200 does not
replace the IS-195 Basic ICS course, but serves as a companion
especially developed for federal disaster workers.
Register and complete
the course online on the National
Emergency Training Center virtual campus.
[Top of Page]

Preparing
for worst
Columbus, Muscogee officials participate in national emergency training
exercise
BY PAT GILLESPIE Staff Writer
Fri, Oct. 01, 2004
Columbus, GA
Muscogee County
and Columbus emergency officials got to see Thursday almost
what they would have to do if the Oklahoma City bombing happened
here.
About 60 officials
were hand-picked to participate in National
Incident Management System training, the first standardized
approach to incident management and response. Developed by
the Department of Homeland Security, it establishes a uniform
set of processes and procedures that emergency officials
will use to conduct response operations.
Thursday's mock
training exercise broke the group into two teams in which
fire, law enforcement and emergency medical services personnel
were asked to respond to the downtown area after a "loud
and vicious explosion" was heard on a Monday morning.
The scenario was set to an April day when hundreds of visitors
are in town for a convention. In the Oklahoma City bombing,
an explosive-laden truck was detonated at the curb of the
Murrah building on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people.
Learning experience
Fire Capt. Mike
Russell, who acted as a dispatcher for one team, said the
exercise taught him that communication is critical to responding
to a situation like that.
"It was extremely
hard to keep track of everybody," he said, adding that
it would be difficult to respond effectively to something
similar to the Oklahoma City bombing. "It's going to
be a mess, especially with the resources we have."
Communication between
supervisors and units on the scene seemed difficult at times,
especially when fire officials who were responding from the
scene received new information and were trying to report
it.
"I think they
did well," said Battalion Chief Bobby Dutton, who helped
to organize the weeklong training. "We made mistakes,
but that was expected."
Explosions were
reported at the Government Center, the Wyndham Hotel and
the Columbus Convention & Trade Center.
Dutton said one
of the biggest problems is trying to treat the wounded, get
to the scene to see what actually happened and preserving
evidence while securing the scene.
"We need more
training in disaster situation," he said. "If we
get that down, house fires, bank robberies will be no problem."
Capt. Rick Kelly,
of the Muscogee County Sheriff's Department, said the part
of the training that was important to him was making sure
to break down communication barriers between departments.
"We need to
get everyone on the same page," he said. "No one
agency can do this on their own without the help of every
other agency."
Columbus Fire and
Emergency Medical Services Chief Roy Waters said he was pleased
with the response.
"You see how
much smoother an operation would work now, because they communicate
and understand their responsibilities," he said. "I'm
so pleased -- there was a lot of enthusiasm in this room,
a lot of understanding, a lot of cooperation."
Contact Pat Gillespie
at (706) 571-8622 or pgillespie@ledger-enquirer.com
[Top of Page]

Miramar
program improves hurricane response
By Laura Burdick-Sherman Special Correspondent
October 1 2004
South Florida
As Hurricanes Frances
and Jeanne pounded parts of the state, Miramar utilized its
new emergency response system, known as NIMS,
or National Incident Management System.
More than 250 city
personnel practiced using the national system out of Fire
Station 84 during Frances, communicating with other command
centers at the city's other fire stations, water treatment
plants, and Police and Public Works departments. Romeo Lavarias,
Miramar Fire-Rescue spokesman, said the main advantage of
the new system is that it allows police, fire and other city
departments to "speak the same language."
" The Police
Department looks at a house and the front, they call it a
color, but for the Fire Department, we number the different
parts of the building. That's just our city talking to ourselves;
imagine when you get other police departments and fire departments," he
said, referring to future communication between cities.
Operations, logistics,
planning and finance are the four functions that work in
tandem during an incident to simplify communication and utilize
resources more efficiently with NIMS,
he said. Operations include police, fire and public works
personnel dispatched before, during and after the incident.
Logistics orchestrates supplies and equipment. Planning involves
strategizing for damage assessment, needed manpower, debris
cleanup and demobilization. Finance maintains records of
expenses incurred during a disaster.
Last week, Jeanne
provided Miramar with yet another opportunity to utilize
NIMS, Lavarias said. "We were able to address issues
we had not been able to do during other hurricanes. A lot
of city departments that had not had an active role in hurricanes
in the past are realizing that under the NIMS,
they have an active if not equal responsibility during the
hurricane," Lavarias said.
Getting the Finance
Department involved early in the process, for example, provided
the availability of cash and credit cards in the event the
city needed to purchase items.
Carl Fowler, spokesman
for the Broward Emergency Management Agency and training
coordinator, praised Miramar on its forward thinking.
"Obviously
it's going to be beneficial. Miramar really has done a lot
of innovative things," Fowler said.
Most of Broward
County, he said, operates under a framework called "Emergency
Support Functions," which includes 19 emergency functions
such as transportation, public works, communication, information
and planning and mass care. He said this system meshes well
with NIMS and involves private
industry as well as other cities.
"When the time
comes [for changeover to NIMS],
we will have to make minor adjustments," Fowler said.
In addition to Miramar,
the city of Coral Springs is certified in NIMS.
But the city's emergency management coordinator, Capt. Jeff
Maslan, said they did not use NIMS during
Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne because these were considered
local events for the city.
"Overall, it's
a local event for us with statewide damage, so we were still
able to control our operation with [our Incident Command
System]. Although we utilized ICS, I can understand why Miramar
utilized NIMS in order to exercise
that format of control," he said.
Coral Springs is
in the process of revamping its plan to mirror the national,
state and county response ones, with a target date of October
or November.
NIMS was
created in response to Homeland Security Presidential Directive
5, which requires that all departments and agencies in state
and local governments implement NIMS,
said Gil Jamieson, acting director of NIMS Integration
Center in Washington, D.C. He said the concept was initiated
by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge in March to establish
a National Incident Management System.
"[NIMS]
provides the basis for far more organized preparedness and
response operations. If you have a commander at the local
level, it's pretty straightforward, but if you start responding
to a large disaster, you get resources and people coming
at you from all over the place," he said. "With NIMS,
we're using common standards and organization. It's a much
more efficient posture to speed both the response and recovery
process."
The city's first NIMS drill
took place in August 2003, and the next two practice drills
were canceled. With the approach of Hurricane Charley, city
officials decided to practice using the system.
"We did minor
activation and sent four rescue and engine crews to Charlotte
County during Charley. Then Frances came along and we had
all activity coordinated out of the Unified Command Center
at Fire Station 84," Lavarias said.
The Fire Department
received about 160 calls during the weekend of Frances --
double the usual number, he said. The city experienced minimal
power outages, typical debris such as broken branches, but
no extensive damage, flooding or fatalities.
City Manager Bob
Payton, who was at Fire Station 84 during Frances, said he
was very pleased with the city's efforts.
"In close to
30 years that I've been associated with storms and natural
disasters, this was by far the most well-orchestrated effort
as far as storm preparation and cleanup," Payton said. "We
were ready in all aspects and we're ready should the real
thing happen." The city plans to move the Unified Command
Center to the Sunset Lakes Community Center when a generator
is secured. Equipment and personnel will be moved within
the next two months, Lavarias said.
|