
After
Ridge—Much Done Much
Still to Do
by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
WebMemo #614
November 30, 2004
Secretary Tom Ridge’s recent resignation marks the end
of a historic tenure. As the Department of Homeland Security’s
first secretary, he had to be “on-watch,” protecting
the nation against terrorist attacks every day, while at the
same time building an organization to serve the nation well into
the 21st century. Ridge leaves a legacy of many accomplishments.
His successor, however, still has much work to do, learning the
lessons of the department’s first years and restructuring
the organization for the future.
Homeland security is a strategic problem, and in areas of strategy,
thought should precede action. Ridge’s greatest contribution
to responding to the attacks of 9/11 was in forging a national
homeland security strategy, a strategic approach to fighting
terrorism. The fundamental principal of that strategy was building
a “layered defense”—a balance of initiatives
working together to prevent, respond to, and recover from terrorist
attacks. As Homeland Security Secretary, Ridge began building
the foundational pillars of a truly national homeland security
system. These included:
• Establishing the US VISIT program. This automated entry/exit
system will, for the first time in our nation’s history,
allow immigration officials to account for visitors entering
and leaving the country. It uses biometric data to verify identities,
an added precaution to prevent fraud and screen for terrorists.
• Implementing the Container Security Initiative, a cooperative
agreement with foreign ports to identify, target, and search
high-risk cargo.
• Creating the first-ever National
Incident Management System (NIMS), which establishes standardized processes and procedures
for managing incidents for all emergency responders, whether
federal, state, tribal, or local.
Ridge’s successor will have a significant legacy upon which
to build, but there is still much work to be done. Ridge’s
effort was slowed by significant flaws in the organization established
by the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Several fixes are needed,
including:
• Enhancing integration of department activities and building
an integrated leadership culture by creating an undersecretary
for policy, an assistant secretary for international affairs,
and an executive leadership program.
• Establishing a “flatter” department by consolidating
agencies in border and transportation security and reorganizing
directorates with regard both to preparedness and response and
to intelligence.
• Rationalizing security spending by establishing risk-based
mechanisms for department-wide resource allocation and grant
making.
• Clarifying authorities and national leadership roles for biodefense,
cyberdefense, and critical infrastructure protection by establishing
and empowering lead executives.
Working with Congress to address these shortfalls must be the
new Secretary of Homeland Security’s first priority.
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., is Senior Research Fellow in Defense
and Homeland Security in the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis
Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
[Top of Page]

Continuing to serve, keeping the
area safe
By TIM BIRNEY
Times Managing Editor
November 26, 2004 SOUTH WAVERLY -- Dan Nicholson Sr. served his country with a
stint in the U.S. Army Special Forces and with the Department
of Defense.
Now, as an emergency management agent for South Waverly Borough,
Nicholson is serving his community.
Nicholson recently returned from an intensive 28-hour Enhanced
Incident Management Unified Command (IM/UC) course at "Disaster
City" in College Station, Texas. The course is designed
to enhance participants' incident management and decision-making
skills necessary to effectively and safely respond to a weapons
of mass destruction/terrorism incident. The training is conducted
under the auspices of the Office for Domestic Preparedness, which
is a component of the Department of Homeland Security.
Over the last couple of years Nicholson has completed enough
disaster response courses -- from vehicle bomb search detection
to FEMA's professional development certificate training to the
recently completed weapons of mass destruction training -- to
fill a binder with certificates.
"I was in the Special Forces in the Army, so this is right
up my alley when it comes to preparedness and training," said
Nicholson, who is involved as an instructor for CERT (Community
Emergency Response Team) and is a member of the United States
Citizens Corps.
"CERT is not active here in the Valley yet, but there are
people working on it. It's something I hope we can get up and
running soon.
"The Citizens Corps is active ... it helps answer questions
like 'How do I get involved,' as well as 'what do I do for my
own family?,'" said Nicholson. "We distribute, as part
of the process, 'Are you Ready?' publications produced by FEMA.
They are being distributed now at post offices and libraries.
It engages citizens in everything from natural disasters and
chemical disasters to weapons of mass destruction. It's A to
Z."
Nicholson was the first person from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
to complete training at Disaster City. Nicholson views it as
a natural progression for him in his current role with South
Waverly Borough.
"Part of my duties is to constantly educate and prepare
for disaster response, including weapons of mass destruction
incidents. "
"The training goes on and on. I guess that qualifies me
as somewhat of an expert," laughed Nicholson. "Not
really, I'm being facetious. I'm not sure if there is such thing
as an expert in a weapons of mass destruction incident.
"We're just a group of people who are trying to do something,
and to be prepared in the event that something happens.
"It was quite an experience," said Nicholson.
The first question that comes to mind when speaking with Nicholson
is, "Why?" Why spend your time in this manner?
"Terrorism leaves us with two alternatives. We can either
choose to be scared or we can choose to be prepared. I choose
to be prepared," responds Nicholson.
"It's preparedness and not paranoia. There's a level of
preparation and things we can do to prepare prior to an incident
and to actively participate in the federal government's war on
terror here in the homeland," he added.
Nicholson agrees that living in the Valley is somewhat safer
than city living when it comes to acts of terrorism, but cautions
that rural America needs to keep its eyes open.
"It's more of a vigilance among the entire United States
populace. There are things that we deal with in emergency management
all the time, like possible hazmat incidents. We have some factories
in our area that use chemicals, which presents a potential problem.
"When you think of terrorism, you think of someone jumping
on a plane and crashing into a building. That's not necessarily
the case," said Nicholson, noting that the FBI has trained
for scenarios involving terrorism in rural America.
"The people in the Department of Homeland Security have
to exhaust themselves in an effort to think of any scenario that
is possible and then train people in that area.
"General preparedness around the country is really the
main focus, rather than what do we have here in Sayre that could
happen? Because it could happen anywhere and you have to be prepared," said
Nicholson.
Again, Nicholson says preparing and not fearing a disaster,
of any type, is the key to responding.
"In my experience, the Valley is doing everything it can.
There are numerous people in emergency management, the Red Cross
and other various volunteer organizations, working for our safety.
There's no reason to be afraid. There are a lot of tools available
that are just getting to places like the Valley that are coming
down from the federal level. It's just a matter of letting the
public know they are out there," said Nicholson.
Nicholson also believes that communications for emergency personnel
has improved greatly since 9-11. "Communications is one
of the issues that is being addressed at the national level.
As a result of a lot of emergency personnel managers from around
the country getting together and citing communications as one
of the main problems, the U.S. has established, under a Department
of Homeland Security presidential directive, a National
Incident Management System (NIMS). It standardizes the entire country's
approach to dealing with incidents in the incident command system.
"Now, our communication abilities are alike and the types
of resources that we utilize are standardized," said Nicholson.
"To get funding and reimbursement from the government for
training and expenditures, jurisdictions are going to have to
be in compliance with NIMS. There is an effort, right down to
Sayre and South Waverly, to get in compliance," he said.
[Top of Page]

Homeland Security director gets
to know county
by Darren Dunlap
of The Daily Times Staff
November 26, 2004 The furniture arrives this week and the kids are already turning
into Vols fans.
Arizona transplant Kelley Mure is Blount County's first Homeland
Security director and it seems she is settling in comfortably
in East Tennessee.
Mure started just short of a month ago today, on Oct. 25. She
has come in and ``hit the ground running,'' said Blount County
Finance Director Dave Bennett. Her first weeks have been filled
with introductions, getting out to the fire departments, law
enforcement agencies, and utilities to meet people and learn
about their departmental capabilities.
``One of the most important things is establishing relationships,''
Mure, former emergency services coordinator for the city of Glendale,
Ariz., said. ``You don't want to be meeting people for the first
time under duress.''
One of Mure's goals will be getting the cities and counties
compliant with the National Incident Management
System (NIMS),
put in place by presidential directive. NIMS standardizes practices
for emergency services at all levels and aims to improve coordination
for disasters, man-made or 0natural.
Mure brought up NIMS during her interview with the local Homeland
Security Council this summer when she was asked about long-term
goals for the position.
``Her knowledge of Homeland Security and emergency services,
and related specifically to NIMS, are extraordinary, and I think
that's going to help a lot,'' said Bennett.
There are consequences for governments that aren't in compliance
with NIMS by 2006, such as loss of federal grants for equipment
and pre- and post-disaster funding.
But Mure doesn't seem worried that the cities or county won't
be in compliance. Some of the pieces are already in place, she
said, and coordination between city and county helps a lot as
well.
``It's going to be one of my priorities,'' she said.
Her office is in the courthouse, but the cities of Maryville,
Alcoa and Blount County pay the director's salary through an
interlocal agreement with the county Homeland Security Council,
according to Bennett.
Some other goals for the county include helping departments
with assessments for NIMS and bringing back more funding to local
governments for emergency preparedness. Mure has taken note of
the county's many volunteer emergency services and wants to help
them, too.
``One of my goals is to see the volunteer departments get the
resources they need,'' she said.
She also wants to improve the flow of public information regarding
emergency preparedness and prevention.
``We need to make sure we're effectively communicating to the
people in our community, to the people we serve,'' she said.
[Top of Page]
 
Speeches & Statements
Remarks by Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge at the Launch of New Ready
Campaign Public Service Advertisements
Washington, DC
Press Conference
November 22, 2004
(Remarks as Prepared)
Thank you Kathy for that warm introduction. I’m honored
to be here today with those of you who have been such steadfast
partners in our efforts to better prepare the communities and
families of this country. This is the week we give thanks, so
let me begin by offering mine. Thank you to NAB and NCTA for
hosting this event, as well as the Ad Council and BBDO for all
your hard work in developing this campaign. And, of course, Marty,
thank you for your continued commitment and that of the American
Red Cross to this vital issue. Everyone knows the Red Cross is
really the grandmother of all emergency preparedness efforts.
Your hard work is critical to the progress we’ve made.
When the Department of Homeland Security was stood up, President
Bush laid out clear directives that have shaped our priorities
and goals moving forward to protect this nation. One of those
directives was to increase national preparedness. We’ve
had a lot of help from private organizations such as the Red
Cross who has a long history of preparing this nation to meet
disasters. From state and local governments who have developed
their own preparedness plans and education campaigns. And from
private citizens who have taken the initiative to prepare their
neighborhoods and homes.
Our efforts at Homeland Security have encompassed a wide range
of initiatives of which the Ready campaign is an integral part.
For the preparedness message to resonate most effectively it
must be delivered at the local and community level where it will
make a difference. We must continue to reach out to our local
and state leaders, city officials, first responders and citizens.
And to invest them with the tools, direction and necessary resources
to prevent and recover from any potential disaster whether natural
or man-made.
Most of you are familiar with our philosophy – we believe
that homeland security is more than a federal department. It
is a national calling. All of us have a role and responsibility
in the protection of our country, and we must be both ready and
willing to make security a priority.
That’s why when we laid down key priorities for the Department
on our first anniversary in March. Those priorities included
building more prepared communities. And we have done so by developing
procedures and policies that will guide our actions in the event
of a terrorist attack; conducting training and exercises to ensure
that our first responders possess a necessary level of preparedness;
enhancing partnerships with state and local governments, private
sector institutions and other organizations; and funding the
purchase of much-needed equipment for first responders, states,
cities, and towns. All of these activities contribute to a level
of national preparedness that is critical to achieving our goal
of a better prepared America.
At Homeland Security we have worked with state and local partners
to create a framework – a National Response Plan – for
emergency preparedness planning that will guide and coordinate
the integration of our national response capabilities, but also
will ensure that localities and states still have the freedom
to make decisions necessary to safeguard their citizens. We’re
set to unveil this framework soon.
This blueprint will enhance current federal capabilities and
unify the team that will be charged with responding to potential
attacks or disasters. It’s a plan that’s being developed
with guidance from all stakeholders – including the American
Red Cross.
As part of this plan, we’ve introduced the National
Incident Management System – or NIMS – so that, in the event
of a crisis, everyone understands what their role will be – and
will have the tools they need to be effective. For the first
time, all of the Nation’s emergency teams and authorities
will use a common language, and a common set of procedures when
working individually – and together – to keep America
safe. We are working with these same partners to develop a National
Strategy for Preparedness. Citizen preparedness must be a component
of that strategy, and I appreciate Marty Evans serving on the
initiative’s steering committee, along with the efforts
of others in this room and around the country.
Of course, the main thrust of our operational efforts has been
to provide for the good men and women on the front lines during
an emergency. To date we have allocated or awarded more than
$13 billion to ensure that our first responders have the right
equipment, the right training and the right amount of support
to continue to do their jobs well. Just as important as having
the necessary resources and training is the ability for first
responders to communicate and operate effectively at the scene
of a disaster, regardless of jurisdiction or discipline.
And so we have and will continue to aggressively pursue the
establishment and implementation of interoperable standards and
equipment. Emergency preparedness has changed so much through
the years. We now have equipment that can detect the presence
of a bomb, sensors that can pick up trace amounts of biological
agents, and storm-tracking systems that give us precious warning
and preparation time.
And we have citizens ready to be engaged. We have professionals
at all levels of government and the private sector who are smarter
and better prepared than ever before. Our history as Americans
has been marked by citizens ever ready to lend a hand and answer
the call of those in need.
On September 11th, our nation and an entire world saw the tremendous
spirit of compassion and heroic sacrifice that resides in the
hearts of the American people. That spirit displayed so prominently
in the wake of 9/11 is a powerful force that we have sought to
harness and bring to our aid in the fight against terrorism.
In doing so, we have depended on our partners in the private
sector, academia and all levels of government to help us engage
and empower citizens to embrace a direct role in securing their
families, their freedoms and their communities.
Our efforts at Homeland have been centered around the work of
the Ready Campaign and Citizen Corps. It’s not an exaggeration
to say that Ready has truly taken off and greatly exceeded expectations.
In the short time since its launch, the simple “Ready” message – make
a plan, get a kit, be informed – has reached millions of
American families.
This past year we’ve built on the initial campaign with
the launch of Ready Business and the development of Ready Kids,
which will kick off within a few weeks. In September we were
joined by more than 80 partners and all 56 states and territories
in marking our first annual National Preparedness Month – a
month in which nearly 60 million people heard the preparedness
message.
Yet the most important measure of accomplishment can be found
in the number of Americans who have not only heard the message…but
taken action. From coast to coast, 58 percent of American households
have taken at least one step to prepare their homes and families – whether
putting together an emergency kit, working out a family communication
plan or searching for information on what to do in the event
of a disaster. That number is the result of a lot of hard work
by people in this room. The intent of the new ads unveiled today
is to further galvanize our collective efforts so we can make
that number to grow even larger. We’ve made a significant
start this first year of the campaign, but that’s what
it is – a start.
Taking one step is great, but we need Americans to take all
three steps, and we will keep working towards that aim. This
is a long-term commitment and together we must be prepared to
see it through for many years to come. Of great help in spreading
the “Ready”” message has been Citizen Corps.
Citizen Corps is an all volunteer organization that helps Americans
find ways to make a personal investment in the security of their
community.
Citizen Corps Councils, which have grown in number to more than
1,400, have helped us deliver the Ready message at the all-important
grassroots level and have provided countless opportunities for
citizens to volunteer their skills and time toward preparing
for a disaster. As a result, in the aftermath of the devastating
hurricanes of a few months ago, Citizen Corps volunteers who
had been trained in first aid, disaster relief, and who were
willing to help were deployed to assist citizens of Florida,
Louisiana and surrounding states get back on their feet.
Both Ready and Citizen Corps have drawn upon the strength of
our citizenry to make this nation stronger and more secure. It’s
our responsibility to sustain that momentum and push for even
higher standards of preparedness.
Over the next year, Citizen Corps will continue to expand – adding
750 new Community Emergency Response Teams, bolstering integration
efforts between citizen participation and homeland security initiatives
and striving to have Councils in place to serve 70 percent of
the U.S. population.
At Homeland Security, we will continue to build on the Ready
campaign by creating a mentoring initiative through Ready Business,
incorporating a school based program that will complement the
Ready Kids website and renewing our commitment to National Preparedness
Month.
In pursuing this work, we look forward to the continued support
and partnership we gain from those of you who are part of this
extraordinary national effort. Your time and commitment so far
have been instrumental in helping us strengthen awareness and
spearhead action throughout the citizenry and communities of
this vast land. Bottom line – we’re all in this together.
Each of us bears the title of citizen. So we must also shoulder
the responsibilities that accompany that great trust.
And in doing so we will ensure that future generations of citizens
inherit more than just a title, but also the blessings of liberty
that, in this great nation, the title of citizen represents.
Thank you.
###
[Top of Page]

Disaster plan erases local boundaries
Mark Zaretsky, Register Staff
11/21/2004 If a major chemical disaster struck the Bayer campus in West
Haven or the Cytek plant in Wallingford, evacuation might well
extend to neighboring communities — and your level of danger
might just depend on which way the wind was blowing.
If Connecticut was walloped by a Category 5 hurricane, the only
way to rescue you from your underwater house in New Haven might
be through East Haven. A few miles to the west, the only way
off Milford Point might be by boat from Stratford.
If a terrorist’s bomb blew up the Yale Bowl during a football
game, thousands of casualties might be cut off from New Haven.
West Haven’s Allingtown Fire Department, which is on the
other side, might need lots of help.
For many years, police, fire, health, public works and education
departments did not give these issues great consideration, at
least not in any great detail beyond mutual aid for major fires.
But in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — and
with strong encouragement, including financial incentives, from
the federal government — they’re thinking, talking
and meeting about it now.
The full extent of the planning might be reassuring. Or a shock.
But whether it’s widely known or not, it’s taking
place.
One goal — especially in Connecticut, one of just two
states without county government — is to use the Federal
Emergency Management Administration’s National
Incident Management System to establish a protocol to create a broader
emergency structure that can act regionally in an emergency.
Nearly $40 million in federal money is financing the effort.
The idea, Wallingford Fire Chief Peter Strubel said last week
at the first meeting of a new regional emergency planning body,
is that in Connecticut, "We can still keep our … 169
cities and towns. But we can bring it together … and make
it look like Dade County, Fla., when we need to."
In recent months, area emergency officials have divided the
region into four sub-regions and begun stationing equipment such
as decontamination trailers in remote locations, both to keep
it close to area communities and so that if one area gets cut
off by a disaster, others still can respond.
The equipment, much of it bought with U.S. Department of Homeland
Security funds, has been selected so area towns for the first
time have compatible equipment that they all know how to use,
officials said.
"If a situation occurs, these things don’t know any
boundaries — New Haven, East Haven, West Haven," said
New Haven Fire Chief Michael Grant. "By pooling all of our
resources, we’re better equipped to deal with a situation.
"We’ve always had communication with other towns,
primarily for fire purposes," Grant said.
But ever since it became clear that a major disaster might just
as easily be man-made as an act of God, "it has really heightened," he
said.
If there is ever a chemical leak or explosion in West Haven, "It
will be in New Haven in 30 minutes. It will be in East Haven
in 40 minutes," said East Haven Fire Chief Wayne Sandford,
chairman of New Haven Area Special Hazards, a regional emergency
response team formed before 9/11 but even more vital now.
The regional body, which represents 16 cities and towns, is
one of five regional emergency response teams in the state, joining
those in the Hartford, Norwich, Waterbury/Torrington and Fairfield
County areas.
It formulates the region’s response to major disasters
that cut across local lines.
A second body, the South Central Regional Emergency Planning
Committee, aims to do on a regional level what municipal readiness
committees already have done in individual cities and towns:
have a plan in place for anything that might happen, be it a
natural disaster or a terrorist attack.
That organization held its first meeting Wednesday at the New
Haven Fire Department academy, with representatives of a number
of communities, including New Haven, East Haven, Orange, Milford,
Wallingford, Yale University and various state and regional agencies
attending.
"It’s much more than just fire" departments
cooperating, said Sandford. "It’s fire, it’s
police, … it’s health, it’s education. It really
crosses all the boundaries for emergency management," he
said.
"Massachusetts and Connecticut are the only two places
that don’t have county forms of government and it does
make it a little trickier, because you’re missing that
built-in level of cooperation," said New Haven’s acting
chief administrative officer Jennifer Pugh, who is in charge
of disbursing $7.6 million in federal funds earmarked for New
Haven and the six municipalities that border it.
"But it’s actually gone pretty well," she said. "What
we’re getting better at, I think, is identifying where
we can cooperate, working with our neighbors."
While it technically belongs to New Haven, one key regional
resource is the New Haven Police Department’s new, state-of-the-art
Hazardous Devices Unit Response Vehicle, which replaced the department’s
1985-vintage "bomb truck."
The vehicle, bought with $136,000 in Homeland Security funds,
is one of four in the state, with the others operated by the
Hartford and Stamford police departments and state police.
The vehicle organizes and transports all the things the department
might need to identify and begin responding to an emergency,
from protective "bomb suits" to sensitive chemical
and radiological metering and monitoring equipment, officials
said.
"It’s kind of one big, rolling tool box," said
Lt. Rick Rohloff, the department’s emergency services coordinator.
The NHPD, under Chief Francisco Ortiz, expects eventually to
become the first police department in the state to have all 417
of its sworn officers fully trained and issued protective equipment
to respond to any sort of disaster, squad member Ray Crowley
said.
While the FBI would be lead investigator in any kind of terrorism
event, "we have a great relationship with the state and
federal government," Crowley said. "We train jointly
with state police and the FBI."
"Readiness" has been a buzzword since the days of
Civil Defense and Cold War-era fallout shelters. But what’s
going on today is not the same, said Sandford.
"The big difference is that in the ’50s and ’60s
it was totally defensive," he said. "Basically, we
were building shelters to protect the residents. I think now,
after 9/11, we have seen that police and fire are the defenders" of
society’s security and well-being."
Now the region’s health directors are meeting and coming
up with a regional plan to map out the public health response
to various disasters, said East Shore Health District Director
Jim Monopoli.
The ultimate goal is to have a statewide public health emergency
plan, said David J. Brown, emergency preparedness planner for
the state Department of Public Health.
Mark Zaretsky can be reached at mzaretsky@nhregister.com or 789-5722.
[Top of Page]

Republican governors quietly hear Rove, wrap up two-day meet
AP
November 19, 2004
NEW ORLEANS -- Republican governors wrapped up a low-key two-day
conference here Friday listening to Homeland Security Secretary
Tom Ridge laud the benefits of federal-state cooperation, but
the real star of the show slipped in and out of the meeting at a downtown
hotel unannounced, without talking to reporters: top White
House political strategist Karl Rove.
The architect of President Bush's re-election addressed the governors
at a closed dinner Thursday night in a detailed, statistical
explication of how Bush won, according to some who were there,
including Missouri Gov.-elect Matt Blunt and Ohio Gov. Bob
Taft. Bush campaign manager Ken Mehlman had given a similar
talk to the governors earlier Thursday.
Some who attended said that Rove emphasized Bush's increased
margins among distinct segments of the electorate _ hispanics,
women, evangelicals, and others _ and a major theme was how these
added majorities justified the President's claim of having received
a mandate in the Nov. 2 vote.
Earlier, Mehlman had also dismissed those who questioned the
mandate notion, though this was not the focus of his talk.
Before departing, the Republican Governor's Association members
chose Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn it's new chairman, succeeding Taft.
Mitt Romney of Massachusetts was chosen vice chairman.
Rove's lightning visit provided some excitement but overall
the annual, corporate-sponsored meeting was a bland affair.
Ridge, the security czar, regaled the state chief executives
_ some of whom had already fled the gathering _ with a welter
of acronyms, talking up what he called a "National
Incident Management System," warning the governors about "Vehicle-Borne
Improvised Explosive Devices" _ car bombs _ and telling
them that even more money was available for homeland security
efforts than they were perhaps aware of.
Ridge, an ex-governor himself, came under criticism during the
campaign for appearances and warnings that some said appeared
overtly political, or designed to help Bush's re-election effort.
The former marine curtly dismissed those critics, saying "we
don't do politics" at the Homeland Security department.
There was no mistaking the partisan nature of the group he addressed
here Friday, however, nor of the politics-oriented buzz that
surrounded the gathering: satisfaction that Republicans have
now increased their previous 28-22 majority by one, with the
apparent win of Washington governor-elect Dino Rossi (who got
a standing ovation at the Thursday dinner); and plotting to add
still more governships to the Republican column.
Ridge told the Republican governors here _ as part of a message
he promised for Democratic governors shortly as well: "One
of the challenges we've had is getting money out the door to
you. I will tell you, you haven't accessed it all."
When he had done, the remaining participants bolted to planes
or to a celebrated French Quarter bar, the Napoleon House, to
celebrate the party's triumphs.
[Top of Page]
 
Speeches & Statements
Remarks by Secretary of Homeland
Security Tom Ridge at the Republican Governors Association Annual
Conference
New Orleans
Annual Conference
Republican Governors Association
November 19, 2004
(Remarks as Prepared)
Thank you, Governor Taft, for that kind introduction. I’m
honored to be here with many of my former colleagues. They say: “Once
a governor, always a governor.” I like the sound of that.
And for those of you who are here for the first time, you should,
too. Congratulations, you’re in good company. One of the
reasons this saying has stuck around is because governors take
their experiences with them wherever the next step leads: to
the private sector, to independent organizations, to the Senate,
to the Cabinet – or to the Presidency – for two terms!
Governors balance budgets and provide services. Governors remove
snow and plant trees. Governors help and heal in a crisis. And
some governors make movies, at least one does. But all governors
draw experience from a broad range of responsibilities. Whether
you govern in Rhode Island or Texas, you have to deal with issues
small and large. Well, no issue is bigger than homeland security.
As you know, the responsibilities of homeland security fall largely
on you, and the homeland security advisors and first responders
who work closely with you. And I can assure you that my experience
as governor of Pennsylvania – both before and after 9/11 – guides
my work at the Department of Homeland Security every day.
I realize how much we rely on your expertise and effort, which
is part of the reason we have worked so hard to improve the working
relationship between the federal government and our partners
at the state and local level. And these relationships and partnerships
have brought results – results that have made this nation
more secure. I am pleased to report that together we’ve
created a robust communication system and dedicated ourselves
to unprecedented cooperation. Widespread coordination and information
sharing are the hallmarks of our new approach to homeland security.
These new tools for communication reach horizontally across
federal departments and agencies and vertically to our partners
at the state, local, territorial, and tribal levels. The communications
systems we have developed are technologically smarter, easier
to use and more effective than ever in our country’s history.
For instance, our State and Local Coordination Office maintains
a desk in our state-of-the-art Homeland Security Operations Center – a
24/7 nerve center for information and situational awareness.
In the event of an incident, this Center will enable us to quickly
and effectively get important information to everyone who needs
it to protect our citizens. We’ll do that primarily through
the Homeland Security Information Network. Through this system
we send several products such as information bulletins and threat
advisories that allow us to tailor specific information for specific
recipients – for instance a part of the country or an individual
sector of society.
I want to assure you that we see communication as a two-way
process. We collect information from the field and listen to
what our partners need from us in order to do their jobs better.
Let me re-emphasize that point. We listen to what you need from
us, because we all have the same job to do: protect the homeland.
While we make improvements to information sharing at the federal
level, I encourage you to look internally as well. It’s
important to continue developing intra-state intelligence fusion
centers to enhance your capabilities and ensure statewide connectivity.
And while we also see an important future for similar interstate
fusion centers, we’d like to incorporate them into our
regional structure once that becomes final.
In addition, working together, we developed the National
Incident Management System – you know it as NIMS. It’s a common
playbook for federal, state, territorial, tribal and local governments
to use as we prepare for and work to prevent domestic incidents
of any kind. I sent all governors a letter in September detailing
the steps you need to take to implement this uniform set of processes,
protocols and procedures. As the timelines for compliance come
into focus, I urge you to take action now – so that we
are all ready to respond together if necessary.
Now, I know what you’re probably thinking right now – it’s
a movie quote, and it isn’t “I’ll be back.” You
want me to show you the money. Well, we have. More than $8.5
billion has been awarded to state and local governments through
our newly streamlined grant process. And another $4 billion is
on the way in the FY ’05 Budget. I have visited many places
throughout the country to see this money in action. Thanks to
your hard work, this money is already making people safer.
But we want to make sure those funds move even faster into the
hands of our first responders across the country. That’s
why I established the Secretary’s Task Force on State and
Local Grant Funding. The task force was chaired by Governor Romney
and vice-chaired by Mayor Don Plusquelic of Akron, Ohio. And
it had representation from state legislatures, law enforcement,
fire and emergency management as well as other mayors and governors
from across the country.
This group found that many of the hold-ups in moving money occurred
at the state or local level, and so they made several recommendations
to fix these problems. Among the most important actions recommended
is to streamline state and local procurement rules and regulations
as well as legislative oversight procedures.
And so I urge you to personally take a leadership role as you
work to implement these measures to streamline the grant process
in your states, cities and towns. The Task Force also found that
the reimbursement requirement under the ODP grant programs presented
a problem for many cash-strapped state and local governments.
This year, at our request, Congress has allowed for an exemption
from the Cash Management Act – so communities in your states
won’t have to spend their own money upfront to purchase
new equipment.
This one year exemption is an opportunity for you and local
leaders across the nation to build a grants process that will
work faster and smarter in the long-run. Of course, all of the
technology advancements and system improvements – and even
money – cannot replace one thing: the benefits of partnership.
Every single employee at the Department of Homeland Security
is committed to building strong partnerships with our state counterparts.
Whether our folks are patrolling a border checkpoint, sitting
watch in the HSOC, reviewing grant proposals or screening passengers
in our airports, we are committed to working with you to achieve
our mission: preserving our freedoms, protecting America: securing
our homeland. And I know that you are committed to the same thing.
As governors, you understand what it means to get things done,
and what it takes to do so. In this case, it takes each of us
working individually and together to prevent a terrorist attack.
I don’t have to remind you that while we work hard to
reduce our vulnerabilities and prevent an attack, we are operating
at a heightened state of alert across the country. As you deal
with everything from stadium construction to school performance,
I urge you to remember that homeland security continues to be
a critical priority for all of us. Thank you for your continued
efforts to improve the already strong partnership that exists
between the federal and state governments. You are stewards of
a great legacy of state leadership. Your individual actions improve
security for your citizens. And by working together, we can – and
will – continue to protect the benefits of freedom for
all Americans.
Thank you.
###
[Top of Page]

Approval imminent for terrorism response plan
By Joe Fiorill, Global Security Newswire
November 16, 2004
An integrated national plan for response to terrorist attacks
and other national emergencies is likely to be approved by Cabinet
secretaries by the end of this week, Deputy Homeland Security
Secretary James Loy said Tuesday.
By this time next year, the final National Response Plan will
have replaced the disparate plans now in effect at federal
agencies that work terrorism response, the former Coast Guard
commandant said at a maritime-security conference in Washington
organized by Defense Today and held at George Washington University.
A February 2003 directive by President Bush required the fledgling
Homeland Security Department to design and implement the National
Response Plan and the associated National
Incident Management System in a bid to "establish a single, comprehensive
approach" to managing terrorist attacks, natural disasters
and other large-scale emergencies.
The National Incident Management System is intended to guide
operations during incidents and is based on the Incident Command
System, already widely used by emergency agencies around the
country. The broader National Response Plan lays out the administrative
structure behind response operations, bringing together existing
plans such as the Domestic Terrorism Concept of Operations
Plan and the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
Under last year's directive, the response plan and operational
system were to be developed by the Homeland Security Department,
then reviewed by the president's Homeland Security Council,
which includes several Cabinet secretaries.
The directive required federal agencies to adopt the incident-management
system and to help to develop, and ultimately adopt in their
own practice, the overall emergency-response plan. The president
instructed agencies by fiscal 2005 to give emergency-response
grants only to those states and localities that practiced the
National Incident Management System.
Among the effects of the National Response Plan is the designation
of a "primary federal agency" charged with managing
the response to each type of incident envisioned.
According to a draft of the plan, Homeland Security's Emergency
Preparedness and Response Directorate would be responsible
for incident response "regardless of the cause," as
well as for general coordination of emergency management for
all hazards.
Homeland Security agencies would also be in charge of several
other areas. The department's Information Analysis and Infrastructure
Protection Directorate would be responsible for infrastructure
protection and for information, and its Border and Transportation
Security Directorate would be responsible both for border and
transportation security and for terrorism preparedness generally.
The State Department would be responsible for international coordination,
while the Defense Department would be responsible for protecting
the U.S. territory against military attacks.
[Top of Page]

First responders seek common lingo
XML serves as base of new language
BY Diane Frank
Nov. 15, 2004
A national effort to ensure that first responders can exchange
information among any systems is picking up steam as community
officials renew their efforts to overcome traditional barriers
to sharing information.
Interoperability is a hot topic in homeland security discussions,
where it affects voice and data communications among first responders.
Although many groups, including the criminal justice, transportation
and medical communities, have solved some internal interoperability
problems, often the transportation community's solutions are
not interoperable with those of the medical community.
Recognizing the problem, officials in the Homeland Security
Department's Disaster Management e-Government Initiative Office
are working with members of the Emergency Interoperability Consortium
to develop an interoperability language known as Emergency Data
Exchange Language (EDXL). The consortium is made up of federal,
state and local agency officials and information technology industry
leaders.
The members' goal is to have first responders use EDXL, an Extensible
Markup Language standard. Systems that can handle XML will be
able to handle the metadata specific to a first responder community,
standards experts say. Most systems will be able to use EDXL
as system development progresses.
Data interoperability is crucial for nationwide emergency response
systems. DHS' National Incident Management
System (NIMS), for
example, is needed for information sharing, said Frank Cilluffo,
director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George
Washington University.
The future effectiveness of NIMS depends on common federal,
state and local policies and practices that must be in place
by the end of 2007, Cilluffo said.
"The ability to communicate, the ability to make sure that
the data is interoperable, will be absolutely crucial to these
efforts," he said.
Experts at all levels of government have been talking about
achieving interoperability, but true interoperability has been
attained only in small, regional efforts. EDXL, standards experts
say, should allow emergency response officials to share information
more broadly.
Besides NIMS, other interoperability systems and initiatives,
such as the National Capitol Region's Capital Wireless Integrated
Network, could use EDXL to communicate with other systems.
But EDXL alone will not fully solve the interoperability problem,
public safety experts say. Policy issues also must be considered,
including providing systems to cash-strapped communities and
identifying the type of information to be shared. Deciding who
will have access to what information will be a continual matter
of debate, said John Markey, director of the Office of Emergency
Management Fire and Rescue Service Division in Frederick County,
Md.
The EDXL standard itself is the next step in the evolution of
the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP), an open standard for exchanging
hazard warnings and reports. That protocol has already been tested
and certified as an international standard by the Organization
for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, a nonprofit,
global consortium that is developing e-business standards.
CAP is in place and in use, and the XML schema will enhance
its technical capability so that better policy decisions can
be made, said public officials familiar with the protocol. With
XML "headers" and "wrappers," emergency response
data can be freely exchanged among systems and applications,
said Jack Potter, director of emergency services at Winchester
Medical Center in Virginia.
With EDXL, he said, "any given jurisdiction or agency picks
the [application] that works best for them."
[Top of Page]

Don't
sacrifice freedom for money
From Vincent
S. Anderson
November 4, 2004
Mountain Home:
Concerning the Mountain
Home City Council's unanimous approval of the NIMS Resolution:
I went to the Mountain
Home City Council meeting and urged them to read the supporting
documents that precipitated the NIMS Resolution.
I was concerned they would not realize the gravity of their
agreement with the federal government.
I do not believe
we should give up personal freedoms for the purposes of receiving
money from the government. I ask the people of Mountain Home
to read what this obligates them to do concerning Homeland
Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-5 and HSPD-8. Anyone
can read all the documents by going to www.fema.gov/nims.
All I asked of the
city council was for them to read the documents before voting.
The members would not. Also, the Baxter County Quorum Court
is considering the same type of resolution.
Please do not prostitute
our freedom for money.
"They that
give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
— Benjamin
Franklin
|